Admission to listing and eligibility criteria for MTA and STAR segment

Pages 15-17

Access to the stock market: economic logic and listing architecture

Listing is a choice of financial structure that transforms the relationship between company, investors and market. From the corporate side it means moving from predominantly relational finance to market finance, where price, reputation and disclosure become permanent management variables.

Admission to a regulated market requires simultaneous requirements on the issuer, instruments, governance, transparency and floating. These requirements are not just formal: they have the economic function of reducing information asymmetries and support robust and verifiable price formation.

Why go public: benefits, costs and trade-offs

Main benefits

Listing expands access to permanent capital, reduces dependence on banking channels and creates a equity currency useful for acquisitions, incentive plans and strategic partnerships. It also improves the international visibility of the issuer.

In the presence of credible governance, the market can recognize a transparency premium that contributes to reduce the cost of equity and increase financial flexibility in growth phases.

Listed status costs

The recurring costs of compliance, investor relations, auditing and periodic reporting are growing. Indirect costs linked to stock volatility and market pressure on quarterly results also increase.

The trade-off is sustainable when the company has mature managerial processes and an investment pipeline capable of converting raised capital into profitable and stable growth in the medium term.

1) Listing is not mandatory: it is a financial policy decision

Voluntary choice and alternatives

The IPO is one of several funding options: private equity, bank debt, minibonds, industrial partnerships. It becomes preferable when the company needs patient capital, public reputation and recurring market access.

In the pre-listing phase it is useful to compare cost of capital scenarios considering leverage constraints, debt servicing capacity and organic/inorganic growth objectives.

Impact on ownership structures

Opening up capital leads to economic dilution and, potentially, reduction of control. The relevant shareholders must define ex ante lock-ups, shareholder agreements and the structure of administrative rights.

Well-designed governance reduces conflicts between controlling and minority shareholders, lowering the agency risk premium required by the market.

Ex ante evaluation of the financial benefit

The convenience of the listing can be read through the change in the weighted average cost of capital:

\[ WACC = \frac{E}{D+E}k_e + \frac{D}{D+E}k_d(1-T) \]

If the listing improves access to equity and perceived risk, the WACC tends to reduce, increasing the present value of future projects.

2) Admission procedure: two resolutions and a strict timeline

Technical admission resolution

The market manager evaluates legal, accounting and organizational documentation and verifies the consistency of the perimeter information and ensures compliance with the minimum eligibility requirements.

This phase does not coincide with the start of trading: it certifies that the issuer and instruments are suitable to enter the market.

Resolution to start negotiations

The actual opening of the security occurs after pricing, allocation and completion of all settlement activities, personal data coding, calendar of corporate events and operational controls of the participants.

Temporal separation reduces the risk of launch errors and protects the quality of the first market price.

Typical IPO project timeline

The phases include initial assessment, vendor due diligence, prospectus preparation, pre-marketing, bookbuilding, pricing and trade initiation. Each phase has verifiable deliverables and decision gates.

Project governance requires continuous coordination between management, legal advisors, auditors, global coordinator and internal control functions.

3) Requirements for the financial instruments to be listed

Legal compliance and certainty of rights

The instrument must be issued in compliance with corporate and financial regulations, with patrimonial and administrative rights clearly determined in the regulation/statute.

In practice, dematerialisation, ISIN coding, traceability of positions and full enforceability of rights are essential.

Negotiability and post-trade suitability

The security must be able to be traded, cleared and settled with industrial market standards. This implies compatibility with electronic books, CCP/CSD systems and corporate actions workflows.

Securities that are not fully standardized generate operational inefficiencies and greater risk of fail settlement.

Free transferability and liquidity

Excessive transfer constraints reduce the contestability of capital and compromise price formation. For the regulated market, broad circulation is needed, barring physiological and transparent limitations.

Any post-IPO lock-ups must be temporary, communicated and consistent with the stability of the placement.

4) Issuer requirements for admission to the MTA

Accounting track record and balance sheet quality

The presence of certified financial statements over multiple financial years allows analysis of margins, capital structure, quality of earnings and sustainability of operating cash flows.

The homogeneity of accounting criteria (e.g. IFRS) is crucial for comparability with listed peers.

Organizational adequacy and controls

The issuer must demonstrate robust administrative processes, internal control function, risk management oversight, data governance and ability to produce timely price-sensitive communications.

The listing requires a leap in managerial maturity: economic performance is not enough, procedural reliability is needed.

Industrial sustainability and strategic plan

The market evaluates the credibility of the industrial plan, competitive barriers, scalability of the model and capital allocation discipline. Growth must be financially compatible with the declared risk profile.

Companies with a coherent strategic narrative and monitorable KPIs tend to have less post-listing information volatility.

5) Diffusion and free float: necessary conditions for liquidity

Operational definition of free float

The free float is the portion of shares actually available for trading, net of stable shareholdings, restricted shares, or holdings by parties with a non-trading horizon.

\[ Float\% = \frac{Freely\ Tradable\ Shares}{Total\ Shares\ Issued}\times 100 \]

An adequate free float is a prerequisite for contained spreads and price resilience.

Role in pricing and adverse selection

In securities with low diffusion, the information risk perceived by market participants increases, with widening of the bid-ask spread and greater price impact of orders.

In microstructural terms, the adverse selection component of the spread increases when the book is thin and the distribution of information is not very symmetrical.

Investor base and demand stability

A larger free float facilitates the entry of institutional funds and indices and improves analyst coverage and reduces dependence on a few dominant investors.

The combined effect is better market depth and less price fragility in times of stress.

6) Size and capitalisation: economic requirements and market signals

Expected capitalization and investability

The market size influences access to professional investors, the probability of coverage and the possibility of inclusion in benchmarks. Adequate scale improves the contestability of the security.

It is not just the total market cap that counts, but the portion that can actually be invested based on the free float.

Reference metrics

\[ Market\ Cap = P\times N \]

\[ Free\ Float\ Cap = Market\ Cap\times Float\% \]

The two metrics must be read together to evaluate the real capacity of the market to absorb relevant orders.

Quality of size

A high but not very liquid capitalization can remain unattractive. Quality comes from interaction between free float, turnover, stability of profits and consistency of corporate communication.

In practice, the "useful dimension" is the one that supports efficient pricing even in volatile conditions.

7) Information prospectus and due diligence

Economic function of the prospectus

The prospectus is not just a requirement: it is the main mechanism for reducing information asymmetry between insiders and outside investors at the time of the offering.

It must make the business model, risks, corporate structure, financial policies and use of proceeds transparent.

Multi-level due diligence

The audits cover legal, tax, accounting, ESG, operational and contractual areas. The objective is to identify material critical issues before listing and align disclosure and company reality.

Incomplete due diligence increases the risk of post-IPO repricing and reputational litigation.

Role and responsibilities of advisors

Global coordinators, legal consultants and auditors perform technical and narrative certification functions, ensuring consistency between equity story, historical data and forward-looking perspectives.

The quality of the advisory directly affects the credibility of the offer and the stability of the aftermarket.

8) Governance of a listed company: management of information risk

Bodies and committees

The weight of independent directors and internal board committees (risk control, remunerations, appointments), with greater formalization of strategic decisions.

A robust board architecture improves the quality of management monitoring and allocative discipline.

Internal control and continuous compliance

Procedures on inside information, internal dealing, related parties and the financial calendar become central. These safeguards reduce the risk of market abuse and sanctions.

Effective compliance integrates technology, authorization processes and communications traceability.

Investor relations as a strategic function

IR is not cosmetic communication: it coordinates guidance, conference calls, roadshows and answers to market questions, maintaining coherence between strategic narrative and actual results.

Professional IR reduces noise volatility and supports a more stable valuation multiple.

STAR segment: strengthened requirements, liquidity and transparency

STAR represents an advanced level of quality within the mainstream market. The goal is to encourage companies that combine governance discipline, high transparency and sufficient liquidity to attract institutional capital.

In economic terms, STAR functions as a signaling mechanism: it reduces information uncertainty, facilitates comparability between issuers and can contribute to a more readable risk-return profile.

9) Positioning of the STAR segment in the MTA ecosystem

Segment identity

STAR is designed for issuers with a solid industrial profile and orientation towards sustainable growth, who intend to dialogue with professional investors on high information standards.

The segment increases the readability of the market for qualitative clusters, reducing excessive heterogeneity.

Reputational effect and cost of capital

Membership in STAR signals robust governance and transparency, with possible reduction in the specific risk premium required by investors in equity pricing.

The reputational benefit is not automatic: it must be maintained with information consistency and operational performance.

10) Quantitative and qualitative requirements for STAR eligibility

Size and effective float

In addition to the regulatory thresholds, a diffusion of capital capable of supporting is essential ordinary and extraordinary volumes without excessive impact on the price.

A numerically adequate float concentrated in a few hands does not guarantee genuine liquidity quality.

Strengthened governance

The issuer must demonstrate corporate governance structures consistent with best practices, independence of controls and transparency in relevant decisions.

The segment rewards the ability to transform formal governance into substantive governance.

Advanced disclosure and internationalization

Communication to the market must be frequent, comparable and accessible also to foreign investors, with linguistic and information standards that facilitate cross-border analyses.

Quality disclosure improves the probability of analyst coverage and stable demand over time.

11) Specialist: liquidity support function

Microstructural role

The specialist oversees the continuity of the market by publishing purchase and sale proposals, especially in the phases in which the order flow is less deep.

The expected effect is a reduction in the probability of book gaps and non-informative price jumps.

Impact on spreads and execution

The presence of specialists tends to compress the average spread and improve the probability of execution, favoring entry/exit of investors with orders of significant size.

More evident benefits emerge on mid caps where natural liquidity is physiologically lower.

Economic limits of the function

The specialist does not compensate for weak fundamentals: he can attenuate the trading friction, but it does not replace the quality of profits, governance and credibility of the industrial plan.

For this reason, the liquidity-support function must be assessed together with issuer performance indicators.

12) Periodic transparency and information regulation

Structured periodic disclosure

Financial statements, interim reports and operational KPIs must comply with standards of accuracy, timeliness and comparability. The consistency of disclosure reduces surprises and abrupt revisions of expectations.

The market rewards information predictability, not the overabundance of non-measurable communication.

Price-sensitive information

Material events must be disclosed in a symmetrical and timely manner to preserve market integrity. Information delays or ambiguities increase legal risk and non-fundamental volatility.

An internal escalation procedure that quickly distinguishes relevant facts from management noise is essential.

Relationship between disclosure and value

Better information quality tends to reduce the opacity discount and stabilize the cost of equity, especially in contexts of high interest rates and greater risk aversion.

In the long term, disciplined transparency is a competitive advantage in raising capital.

13) Permanence in the segment and continuous monitoring

Maintenance checks

STAR status requires ongoing compliance on free float, governance, transparency and organizational controls. It is not a brand acquired once and for all.

Periodic checks push the issuer to maintain high managerial discipline even outside the placement phases.

Risk of downgrading

Persistent deteriorations in liquidity or disclosure may compromise permanence in the segment, with reputational effects and potential reduction in demand from mandated funds.

Downgrading can amplify the reputational cost if it coincides with negative earnings revisions.

Value of qualitative continuity

Stable permanence produces cumulative reputational capital: more market trust, lower dispersion of analysts' estimates and greater resilience of the stock in phases of stress.

From a strategic perspective, qualitative continuity is worth at least as much as the short-term economic result.

14) Post-listing control metrics

Free float turnover

Measures the turnover of capital actually available for trading:

\[ Turnover_{float} = \frac{Volumi\ scambiati\ nel\ periodo}{Free\ Float\ Cap} \]

Values that are too low indicate an inactive market; excessively high and unstable values can signal tactical trading and flow-driven volatility.

Synthetic liquidity indicator

A useful indicator is the inverse version of Amihud illiquidity:

\[ LQ = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{t=1}^{N}\frac{Vol_t}{|r_t|+\epsilon} \]

The higher the value, the greater the market's ability to absorb volumes with limited price variations.

Managerial use of metrics

Post-listing metrics are used to diagnose whether the stock is achieving structural liquidity or if it requires interventions on communication, free float and analyst coverage.

Monthly monitoring integrated with book and ownership data improves the quality of IR decisions.

Stock market segmentation, GEM and after-hours trading

Market segmentation responds to different needs: issuer profile, investor geography, exchange horizon and level of standard required. In the teaching material this theme emerges in the distinction between the daytime market, sections dedicated to foreign issuers, and after-hours trading.

From an economic perspective, segmentation can improve matching between supply and demand of capital, but it requires attention to price continuity, risk of fragmentation and information homogeneity between locations and time slots.

15) MTA and connected segments: economic function of segmentation

Why segment markets

Segmenting means differentiating rules and standards for groups of issuers with homogeneous characteristics. This improves comparability and reduces information noise in the relative evaluation.

For investors, segmentation helps build coherent universes of mandate, risk and expected liquidity.

Effect on pricing and governance

Segments with clear requirements tend to reward disciplined issuers and penalize organizational opacity. In this sense, segmentation also becomes an incentive for the quality of corporate governance.

An effective regulatory design prevents the segments from transforming into mere formal containers without real differentiation.

16) BIT GEM (Global Equity Market): logic and perimeter

Purpose of the international sector

The segment dedicated to foreign securities expands diversification for domestic investors, enabling access to global issuers without changing local operational infrastructure.

This reduces operational friction and can increase advanced retail participation in international names.

Technical integration with the main market

Trading, clearing and settlement remain anchored to the central systems of the marketplace, improving reliability and standardization. However, there remain possible differences in the events calendar and information regime of the foreign issuer.

The robustness of the post-trade is a necessary condition to avoid friction in cross-border operations.

Additional risk profile

In addition to corporate risk, country risk, regulatory risk and implicit/explicit exchange risk emerge. The analysis must therefore integrate macro-financial and geopolitical variables.

The risk premium requested by the market reflects this stratification of factors.

17) After-hours trading (TAH): opportunities and limits

Operational usefulness of the evening session

The after-hours session allows investors to react to news published after the closing of the daytime market, reducing the risk of unmanaged overnight gaps for the most active investors.

It is particularly relevant on days with macro or corporate events after the close.

Absence of full market continuity

The reference material mentions the incomplete continuity between the daytime market and the TAH. This implies potential widening of spreads and less depth of the evening book.

Lower order density increases the risk of less efficiently priced executions.

Execution policy in TAH

In the evening session, limit and fractional size orders are preferable, with strict control of the maximum/minimum price accepted. The indiscriminate use of market orders can generate high slippage.

A dedicated execution policy reduces implicit costs and improves consistency of the operating result.

18) Prospectus and admission of issuers already listed abroad

Differentiated documentary regimes

For issuers already listed on recognized markets, simplified information paths may apply, provided that the set of documents guarantees substantially equivalent standards.

Simplification reduces time and costs, but cannot reduce the information protection of investors.

Principle of substantial equivalence

Equivalence concerns completeness, up-to-dateness, verifiability and clarity of data. If one of these elements is weak, the risk of information misalignment between markets increases.

Cross-border comparability also requires temporal consistency of price-sensitive communications.

Risk of operational misalignment

Time zones, different calendars and different information practices can create temporary price differences between trading venues, especially on relevant events published at non-aligned times.

It is therefore essential for the investor to monitor primary headquarters, newsflow timing and relative liquidity.

19) Operational checklist for an MTA/STAR candidate issuer

Pillar 1: corporate readiness

  • Consistent and comparable certified financial statements across multiple financial years.
  • Formalized internal control system with clear responsibilities.
  • Organized data room and repeatable reporting processes.
  • Preventive mapping of material legal and operational risks.

Pillar 2: governance and disclosure

  • Adequate board structure with independents and effective committees.
  • Procedures on inside information, related parties and internal dealing.
  • Annual IR calendar with KPIs, guidance and communication policies.
  • Decision-making traceability and reputational control over press releases.

Pillar 3: market and liquidity

  • Free float structure consistent with investability targets.
  • Placement plan aimed at investors with a stable horizon.
  • Continuous monitoring of spread, turnover and book depth.
  • Engagement strategy with analysts and institutional investors.

20) Interpretative summary

Central message

Admission to listing is a multi-level process: technical requirements, information quality, Substantive governance and liquidity structure must be consistent with each other.

If one of the levels is weak, the stock may be formally listed but economically fragile.

MTA vs STAR: substantial difference

MTA provides access to the regulated market; STAR adds a higher quality threshold on transparency, governance and liquidity, with potential benefits on pricing and the investor base.

STAR membership requires ongoing discipline, not just short-term performance.

Long-term managerial implication

Effective listing does not end with the debut: it is a permanent commitment to public accountability. The competitive advantage arises from the ability to maintain strategic credibility and information quality over time.

From this perspective, the market rewards consistency and continuity more than promotional narrative alone.